Nearest Neighbor Analysis
Nearest neighbor analysis measures the average distance between each point and its closest neighbor in a dataset, comparing it to the expected distance under a random distribution. It provides a statistical test for whether a spatial point pattern is clustered, random, or dispersed.
Nearest neighbor analysis is a spatial statistics technique developed by Clark and Evans in 1954 that evaluates the spatial arrangement of point features. The method calculates the observed mean nearest neighbor distance across all points and divides it by the expected mean distance for a random (Poisson) point pattern of the same density, producing a nearest neighbor ratio (R).
Interpreting the Ratio
An R value of 1.0 indicates a pattern indistinguishable from random. Values less than 1.0 suggest clustering, with 0 representing complete spatial coincidence. Values greater than 1.0 indicate dispersion, with a theoretical maximum of approximately 2.149 for a perfectly hexagonal pattern. The associated z-score and p-value indicate whether the departure from randomness is statistically significant, enabling analysts to move beyond visual interpretation to objective assessment.
Applications
Ecologists use nearest neighbor analysis to determine whether tree or animal distribution is clustered, random, or regular, revealing competitive or cooperative processes. Archaeologists test whether artifact distributions show deliberate spatial organization. Urban geographers analyze facility locations to assess whether businesses cluster near competitors or disperse to reduce competition. Crime analysts evaluate whether incidents form statistically significant clusters. Epidemiologists test disease case distributions for spatial clusteringSpatial ClusteringSpatial clustering groups geographic features based on their spatial proximity and optionally their attribute similar... that might indicate a common source.
Considerations
Nearest neighbor analysis is sensitive to the study area boundary, because edge effects can bias the mean distance calculation for points near the perimeter. The method also produces a single global statistic and cannot identify where within the study area clustering or dispersion occurs. For local pattern detection, complementary methods such as LISA or kernel density estimationKernel Density EstimationKernel density estimation (KDE) transforms discrete point data into a smooth, continuous density surface by placing a... are preferred.
Bereit?
Sehen Sie Mapular
in Aktion.
Buchen Sie eine kostenlose 30-minütige Demo. Wir zeigen Ihnen genau, wie die Plattform für Ihren Anwendungsfall funktioniert — kein generisches Foliendeck, keine Verpflichtung.